Final answer:
Two historians may interpret a historical event differently largely because their personal biases influence their perspective. These biases impact how they prioritize sources and factors within their research, contributing to varied interpretations.
Step-by-step explanation:
Two historians are most likely to reach different interpretations about a historical event because A. their personal biases toward the event differ.
Interpretation plays a central role in history, and historians' biases, informed by their own experiences and value systems, can lead to differing interpretations. Despite efforts to minimize bias, it is impossible to completely separate oneself from one's environment and beliefs. This influence is a reason why perspectives can vary on the same historical event. Such diversifying perspectives enrich our understanding of history and enable the practice of historical empathy, allowing historians to consider the past without imposing modern-day judgments.
It's not just bias, but also the methodologies, sources, and priorities that can differ among historians, leading them to focus on different aspects of events, and hence, contributing to different interpretations. This pluralism in viewpoints is essential to developing a fuller picture of historical events.