Final answer:
A country with a high physiological density and a low agricultural density may have a low standard of living and faces challenges in providing for its population. Efficient farming systems and agricultural products as main exports can lead to a better standard of living.
Step-by-step explanation:
A country with a high physiological density and a low agricultural density is likely to have a low standard of living and may face challenges in providing for its population. Physiological density measures the number of people per square mile of arable land, while agricultural density refers to the number of farmers per square mile of arable land.
In this context, if a country has a high physiological density but a low agricultural density, it means that there are a lot of people relying on a limited amount of arable land for food production. This could indicate that the country has a low standard of living because it lacks the resources and efficient farming systems to support its population.
In contrast, a country with an efficient farming system and a low agricultural density will likely have the ability to produce enough food to support its population, despite having a high physiological density. This could result in a better standard of living for the population, as agricultural products may be a main source of export and contribute to the overall economy.