Final answer:
King George and other contemporaries may have predicted struggles for the new American leaders forming a stable republic post-independence. Washington's role was crucial in demonstrating a balance between authority and republican virtue, warding off perceptions of a desire for monarchy, and aiding in forming a nation grounded in the principles of republicanism.
Step-by-step explanation:
It appears that King George, along with other British leaders of the time, may have thought that the new American leaders would struggle to establish a stable and united government. The concept of republicanism was guiding post-revolutionary America towards a form of government where leaders would represent the people, as opposed to inheriting power as was the custom with a monarchy. There was also the concern that George Washington might be seen as aspiring to monarchical power, but Washington himself was careful to strike a balance and avoid any such perceptions while fostering national unity.
The idea of restoring a British-like monarchy in the United States might have seemed likely to some British observers, as Partisan newspapers insinuated at the time. The American republic was experimenting with a new form of democracy; one where property owners were initially seen as the most qualified to govern. Ensuring this republicanism remained free from the traditional monarchy was essential, and leaders like Washington embodied the virtues expected in the new political philosophy.