Final answer:
The situational irony in the statement reflects the contrast between the speaker's support for the Burmese and opposition to their British oppressors, and the historical context of British colonization, which involved exploitation despite intentions of bringing progress.
Step-by-step explanation:
The situational irony in the statement "I was all for the Burmese and all against their oppressors, the British" lies in the contrast between what is said and the actual circumstances or intentions behind it. The irony is evident when considering historical context, notably British colonization. The individual claims to support the Burmese people while also acknowledging a stance against British imperial rule, which is unexpected given that the empire believed it was bringing civilization and economic prosperity (though often at a high cost to the colonized societies).
The colonization of Burma and the imperial rule of Britain across its colonies often involved exploitation and oppression, which led to resistance movements and eventual drives for independence. Prominent figures like Mahatma Gandhi started their careers serving the empire but later became instrumental in its dismantling, symbolizing the shift in thought among educated natives who initially worked within the system. This represents situational irony as the very individuals trained by the empire became leaders in the fight against its control, emphasizing the unintended consequences of imperial policies.