Question

Do you find Dr. Natterson-Horowitz’s argument that physicians can learn a lot from veterinarians convincing? What part of her argument is, to you, especially strong or weak?

Answer 1

Answer: You probably don't want to hear this, but you need to be on your own for this one.

Explanation: This is a question asking for your opinion and your perspective. I will, however, give you some things that could be interpreted as strong or weak.

Strong: meaningful talk about the gap between humans and other animals, she has treated both before which gives her a bigger perspective, she is honest about feeling the disconnection herself, and she gives several examples

Weak: the video is quite long and can be hard to follow if you're not like, really passionate about animals, some of what she says goes to be a little ridiculous as well, like ppl thinking cheese comes from trees

good luck!

Answer 2

your question:

Do you find Dr. Natterson-Horowitz’s argument that physicians can learn a lot from veterinarians convincing? What part of her argument is, to you, especially strong or weak?

answer:

Yes, I found it very convincing because of the fact that she has personal experience, facts, and good examples.