97.0k views
8 votes
Should we have civil asset forfeiture ? why or why not ?

User Culix
by
3.0k points

2 Answers

7 votes

Final answer:

Civil asset forfeiture is a controversial practice in which governments and law enforcement agencies seize property before conviction. Arguments in favor of civil asset forfeiture include its potential contribution to public safety, while critics argue that it violates individuals' rights and can lead to abuse.

Step-by-step explanation:

Civil asset forfeiture is a controversial practice where governments and law enforcement agencies seize the property of individuals suspected of crimes, even before conviction. There are arguments both for and against civil asset forfeiture. Those in favor argue that it provides a financial incentive to investigate crimes and can contribute to public safety. However, critics argue that it violates individuals' rights and can be abused by law enforcement, leading to potential racial profiling and property seizure without due process.

User CarCrazyBen
by
3.2k points
7 votes

Answer: Yes

Explanation: It is a important tool against crime, it can be used to deprive criminals of the money and recourses they need to continue operating outside the law

User Jubibanna
by
3.3k points