Question

2.1.10 Practice: Complete Your Assignment

Write an essay that compares and contrasts a Whitman poem with a Dickinson poem. You'll decide how the poets' attitudes or perspectives are alike and different, based on how they use poetic devices such as rhyme and figurative language.
Think about how you might sum up your whole analysis in a single claim. Then think about how you might support your claim with evidence — particularly quotes from the two poems. Finally, consider what commentary you can give that will help readers understand how your evidence supports your claim.
Your essay should include the following elements:


A claim that compares poetic devices in the two poems and explains how they show each poet's outlook
An introduction with a claim, a summary of the poems, and a prediction of the topics you'll cover
Body paragraphs with topic sentences, evidence from the poems, and commentary about your evidence
A conclusion that reviews your main points and makes a final statement for readers to carry away
Transitions that ease readers from one topic to the next and show connections between ideas
You should have completed a draft of this assignment in the activity before this one. If you haven't done so, go back and complete that activity now.

Answer 1

The essay assignment on comparing a Whitman poem with a Dickinson poem focuses on their use of poetic devices to depict their distinct perspectives, requiring a claim, evidence from poems, and analytical commentary, and culminates in a conclusion that synthesizes the insights gained.

Step-by-step explanation:

The assignment of comparing and contrasting a poem by Walt Whitman with one by Emily Dickinson allows students to explore the poetic devices used by these poets and how they reflect each poet's unique perspective. When writing an essay on this topic, one should focus on creating a strong claim about the poets' attitudes and how their use of poetic devices like rhyme and figurative language support that claim. An effective essay will address similarities and differences in the poets' work, providing evidence and commentary to analyze how those elements contribute to each poet's distinct voice in American literature.

The body of the essay should consist of organized paragraphs that provide evidence from the selected Whitman and Dickinson poems, backed with analysis that supports the initial claim. Aspects that might be compared include the poets' use of natural vs. manmade elements, their engagement with historical events like the Civil War, or the unique voices they established in American literature, breaking from the traditions of Emerson, Hawthorne, and Melville.

Finally, a strong conclusion will articulate the ultimate impact or meaning revealed by the comparison, tying together the main points and solidifying the reader's understanding of the insights gained through this literary analysis.

Answer 2

Everyone sees and uses nature in different ways, but as most people they tend to admire andadore nature most times. Whitman and Dickinson share these admirations and what they adorein their poems. Dickinson says while she is in nature she feels closer to the heavens rather whenshe is in church. Whitman says looking at the stars is more exciting and enlightening rather thenlistening to an astronomer rant on about the stars. Although both poets use different poeticdevices and tone, they both admire and adore nature's themselves.Walt Whitman's poem talks like nature is not interesting from the indoors. He has dark,boring, and gloomy tone as he talks about being indoors listening about the stars. "I becametired and sick." He wrote this to state how he feels while he is inside learning about nature. Histone changes when the astronomer is done talking and he finally can go experience it himselfoutside. "In the mystical moist night-air, and from time to time, look'd up in perfect silence atthe stars." He is glad he finally is outside rather then indoors learning looking at the stars.Emily Dickinson also adores and admires nature in her poem. Her language is moreinteresting. She rhymes, but then does not at the same time. She uses metaphors, when shesays that her "church", is nature but with a Bobo-link for a chorisier. She likes her nature athome outside she can experience the nature by herself. "I keep it, staying at home." She doesnot need a building to experience nature and "heaven". As Whitman has a serious toneDickinson has a up eat tone towards the end. "So instead of getting to heaven at last - I'm goingall along." She is basically saying her experience is actually better then being in church.Whitman and Dickinson say the same thing but in different ways. As both poets say thatnature itself is more interesting, powerful, and spiritual than human speeches or humanteaching. Dickinson's tone is more personal. Whitman's tone is more serious

Step-by-step explanation: