Question

**I WILL MAKE SURE ANYONE WHO ANSWERS ALL THE QUESTIONS GETS 100 POINTS** **journalism**

1. Do you think that people who read newspapers also watch local news on television or head online for their news? Explain why one form of news might be more appealing than the other for some people.

2.Would a kicker be as effective if it were in the middle of the news broadcast? Explain your answer.

3. Pacing is an important part of any news broadcast, but it does not always work as planned. Why might a news broadcast have to change its pacing? How would this impact the rest of the news?

4.Why would a news broadcast use a reader instead of a live shot? Give an example of a story that would be better suited for a reader in your answer.

5.What is the advantage of using a package instead of a live broadcast?

Answer 1

1)I think that it just depends on the person honestly. But I think that tv is the better option since it has both, visuals and its easier engage in, therefor its more appealing than the other for some people.

2)No, simply because the kicker is what gets the audience’s attention. And, without the kicker in the beginning not a lot of people would continue on watching.

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope this helps!!! <3

Answer 2

Step-by-step explanation:

The television that has news on different channels are more appealing because they don't have to read or pay money they can go on the internet to look at the recent news.

If they changed the pacing of the brodcast of news would badley impact the news because if they change the pass to be more fast more people would not be abeal to to comprehend the news or more slow pace would be very boring the next five minutes and alot of people would get off of the news channel.

A kicker would be affective inmiddle of a news section because then you can keep telling the people who are still lisening to keep on watching till the very middle for best thing that most people want to see.