393,297 views
45 votes
45 votes
g A manufacturer of nickel-hydrogen batteries randomly selects 100 nickel plates for test cells, cycles them a specified number of times, and determines that 11 of the plates have blistered. Does this provide compelling evidence for concluding that more than 10% of all plates blister under such circumstances

User Ijaz Ahmed Bhatti
by
2.1k points

1 Answer

17 votes
17 votes

Complete Question

A manufacturer of nickel-hydrogen batteries randomly selects 100 nickel plates for test cells, cycles them a specified number of times, and determines that 11 of the plates have blistered. Does this provide compelling evidence for concluding that more than 10% of plates blister under such circumstances?

A) State H_0 and H_a, (5 pts)

B) Test the hypothesis using the P-Value approach at a significance level of 4%: (15 pts)

Expert Answer

Answer:

a)
H_0:p=0.10


H_a:p>0.10

b) We fail to reject Null hypothesis

Explanation:

From the question we are told that:

Sample size n=100

No. with blistered x=11

a)

Generally the Hypothesis given as


H_0:p=0.10


H_a:p>0.10

b)

Since p=0.10

Therefore


p'=(11)/(100)


p'=0.11

Test statistics


Z=(p'-p)/(√(p(1-p)))


Z=(0.11-0.10)/(√(0.10*0.90/100))


Z=1.33

From table


P-Value =0.092

Therefore

P-value >0.04 significance level

Hence,We cannot conclude that at
4\% significance level the proportion is greater than
10\%

We fail to reject Null hypothesis

User Jsa
by
3.1k points