9514 1404 393
Answer:
- (x, y) ⇒ (x +n +s, y +1 +m)
- (x, y) ⇒ (x +s +n, y +m +1)
- they are identical in effect; order does not matter
Explanation:
Substitute the expressions.
A then B
After the first translation, the value of x is (x+n). Put that as the value of x in the second translation.
x ⇒ x +s . . . . . . . . . the definition of the second translation
(x+n) ⇒ (x+n) +s . . . the result after both translations
The same thing goes for y. After the first translation, its new value is (y+1).
y ⇒ y +m . . . . . . . . the definition of the second translation
(y+1) ⇒ (y+1) +m . . . the result of both translations
Then the composition of A followed by B is (x, y) ⇒ (x +n +s, y +1 +m).
__
B then A
The same reasoning applies. After the B translation, the x-coordinate is (x+s) and the y-coordinate is (y+m). Then the A translation changes these to ...
x ⇒ x +n . . . . . . . . . . definition of translation A
(x+s) ⇒ (x+s) +n . . . . translation A operating on point translated by B
y ⇒ y +1 . . . . . . . . . . . definition of translation A
(y+m) ⇒ (y+m) +1 . . . . translation A operating on point translated by B
The composition of B followed by A is (x, y) ⇒ (x + s + n, y + m + 1).
__
You should recognize that the sums (x+n+s) and (x+s+n) are identical. The commutative and associative properties of addition let us rearrange the order of the terms with no effect on the outcome.
The two translations give the same result in either order.