110k views
20 votes
Two methods can be used to produce expansion anchors. Method A costs $70,000 initially and will have a $19,000 salvage value after 3 years. The operating cost with this method will be $29,000 in year 1, increasing by $3800 each year. Method B will have a first cost of $109,000, an operating cost of $9000 in year 1, increasing by $9000 each year, and a $39,000 salvage value after its 3-year life. At an interest rate of 9% per year, which method should be used on the basis of a present worth analysis?

User Jzelar
by
5.3k points

1 Answer

8 votes

Answer:

Method B should be used on the basis of a present worth analysis.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given - Two methods can be used to produce expansion anchors.

Method A costs $70,000 initially and will have a $19,000

salvage value after 3 years. The operating cost with this method

will be $29,000 in year 1, increasing by $3800 each year.

Method B will have a first cost of $109,000, an operating cost of

$9000 in year 1, increasing by $9000 each year, and a $39,000

salvage value after its 3-year life.

To find - At an interest rate of 9% per year, which method should be used

on the basis of a present worth analysis?

Proof -

Method A :

Year Initial Cash Net cash Discount Present value

Investment Outflow flow rate

0 70,000 - 70,000 1 70,000

1 29,000 29,000 0.917 26,593

2 32,800 32,800 0.842 27,617.6 3 -19,000 36,600 17,600 0.772 13,587.2

Present Worth $137,797.8

Method B :

Year Initial Cash Net cash Discount Present value

Investment Outflow flow rate

0 109,000 - 109,000 1 109,000

1 9,000 9,000 0.917 8253

2 18,000 18,000 0.842 15,156

3 -39,000 27,000 -12,000 0.772 -9,264 Present Worth $123,145

∴ we get

Present Worth of A = $137,797.8

Present Worth of B = $123,145

Now,

As the present worth is low in Method B, so Method B should be used.

User Anasa
by
5.8k points