66.9k views
25 votes
Analyze the maps below and answer the question that follows. A world map titled Colonized Territories: 1945. The following are shaded: most of Africa, India, Guyana, Suriname, French Guiana, the Caribbean, Belize, Madagascar, Oceania, Bangladesh, Burma, Cambodia. Image by Aniraptor 2001 Map 1: Colonized Territories: 1945 A world map. The key shows Human Development Standing by color. Green = High Human Development, Yellow = Moderate Human Development, Red = Low Human Development. North America and Europe are dark green. Central America, the Caribbean, and South America are yellow, light green, medium green. Africa is yellow, orange, red, dark red, with small areas of light green. Australia is dark green. Asia is yellow, light green, medium green with areas of orange and dark red. Oceania is yellow and light green. Image by Marcos Elias Oliveira Junior Map 2: UN Human Development Index, 2009 Explain how the maps above depict the relationship between neocolonialism and human development.

Analyze the maps below and answer the question that follows. A world map titled Colonized-example-1
Analyze the maps below and answer the question that follows. A world map titled Colonized-example-1
Analyze the maps below and answer the question that follows. A world map titled Colonized-example-2
User Halley
by
6.5k points

2 Answers

5 votes

Final answer:

The maps highlight the relationship between colonialism and current human development, showing a correlation where regions that were heavily colonized tend to have lower human development indicators. These patterns underscore the lasting impacts of colonial exploitation and neocolonialism on former colonies, contributing to economic and developmental disparities.

Step-by-step explanation:

The maps provided indicate a strong correlation between the histories of colonialism and post-colonial human development. The first map detailing Colonized Territories: 1945 shows much of Africa, Asia, and the Americas under the control of European powers, setting a historical context for foreign dominance over local economies, cultures, and political systems. These regions were heavily exploited for their resources with boundaries shaped by European interests, which continues to influence their developmental trajectories to this day.

Turning to the map depicting the UN Human Development Index, 2009, there is a clear trend that those regions which were heavily colonized, such as Africa and parts of Asia, exhibit lower levels of human development (as indicated by areas shaded in red and orange). This suggests a legacy of colonial exploitation that continues to impact these regions in the form of neocolonialism through economic and political pressures exerted by former colonizing countries and global institutions. This relationship shows a pattern where the former colonial powers maintain a higher human development standing, while the colonies have struggled with development challenges.

Additionally, the map suggests that the lasting influence of colonialism has led to inequalities in economic and societal development, as many of the least developed countries (LDCs) correspond with the countries that were subjected to the longest and most intense periods of colonial rule. The concept of neocolonialism helps to understand the current economic dependencies and political alignments that stem from this historical context. Recognizing this helps in making historical connections to imperialism, colonialism, and inequitable resource distribution which are mirrored by current development disparities.

User Susobhan Das
by
5.9k points
8 votes

Answer:

The first map shows colonized nations in 1945. European powers had colonized vulnerable and faltering nations to undergird their economies. The second map shows that, even more than 50 years later, the majority of moderately developed or underdeveloped nations were former colonies of the presently highly developed nations. This conclusion supports neocolonialism in that former colonies have moved toward industrialization and economic independence. The economies of the former colonies are still, to an extent, dictated by, and even hampered by, their former colonizers.

Step-by-step explanation:

this was the possible answer on edg. 2021

User Pentzzsolt
by
6.1k points