Question

The United States Supreme Court in Schenck v. United States (1919) ruled that freedom of speech may be limited during national emergencies when the speech

1) threatens the principle of States rights
2) conflicts with national economic policies
3) interferes with a presidential campaign
4) presents a clear and present danger to the nation

Answer 1

4) presents a clear danger to the nation

Step-by-step explanation:

We can see this used during today, if somone yells that they have a gun in a bank, even though they may not have a gun, they are intending panic to a crowd which is still, 'clear and present danger', and that's why our freedom of speech is extended so far.