Final answer:
Jackson's argument was that federal funding for roads and canals exceeded the powers granted to the federal government in the Constitution, and that these projects should be the responsibility of state governments. He advocated for a limited role of the federal government.
Step-by-step explanation:
Jackson's argument regarding the first of the two viewpoints about government construction of roads and canals was centered around strict constructionist views. He believed that federal funding for internal improvements, such as roads and canals, exceeded the powers granted to the federal government in the Constitution. Jackson saw these projects as the purview of the state governments and believed in limiting the role of the federal government.