Final answer:
The debate over whether schools should change existing models comprises two sides: one advocating for the integration of technology and new incentive structures to enhance learning, and the other emphasizing the preservation of critical elements of traditional education including interpersonal relationships and creative development.
Step-by-step explanation:
Introduction to the Debate on School Reforms
The question of whether schools should get rid of traditional methods and adopt new approaches is a complex issue. Supporters of educational reform argue that schools should replace books with laptops to modernize learning and equip students with the skills needed in a digital world. They may also suggest a variety of proposals to improve school performance, such as testing students regularly, rewarding successful educators, and promoting additional teacher training.
On the other hand, opponents may argue that such reforms could neglect fundamental aspects of learning. They might claim that the focus on technology and testing can overshadow the importance of critical thinking, problem-solving, and creativity. Additionally, they may highlight that the impersonal nature of digital learning fails to account for the social and emotional development of students, and that personal interaction between students and teachers is irreplaceable.
When considering changes to the educational system, it is important to address the potential impact on academic achievement and student well-being. Proposals like student "vouchers", the creation of new schools, and incentivizing performance need to be examined not just for their intended benefits, but also for their broader effects on the education landscape.