175k views
3 votes
Winning: is it everything ? article In the Point article, consider the main idea and any support for it that may be weak. The support can include reasons, evidence, information in print and graphic features, rhetorical appeals, and rhetorical devices. In a paragraph, state the main idea and evaluate the support (at least two examples), explaining how well each example supports the main idea.

User Bbrooke
by
7.6k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Answer: Main idea: Winning is not everything.

Support 1: The article presents various reasons why winning is not everything in life. It mentions how the obsession with winning can lead to negative consequences such as increased stress, anxiety, and a disregard for ethical behavior. This support effectively highlights the drawbacks of solely focusing on winning, thus supporting the main idea.

Support 2: The article also provides evidence from studies and personal anecdotes that winning does not guarantee long-term happiness or fulfillment. It discusses how individuals who prioritize personal growth, learning, and enjoying the process rather than just winning tend to have a more satisfying and balanced life. This evidence supports the main idea by emphasizing the importance of personal development rather than solely focusing on winning.

Overall, both examples of support effectively reinforce the main idea that winning is not everything. They provide compelling reasons, evidence, and insights into the potential negative consequences of an excessive focus on winning.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Mszalbach
by
7.9k points

No related questions found