Answer:
Explanation:
1) The significance test that should be performed in this scenario is a Two-sample t test.
2) The correct hypotheses to test this claim are:
- H0: uCali = uND (The mean consumption of patrons who thought the wine was from California is equal to the mean consumption of patrons who thought the wine was from North Dakota)
- Ha: uCali ≠ uND (The mean consumption of patrons who thought the wine was from California is not equal to the mean consumption of patrons who thought the wine was from North Dakota)
3) To find the test statistics and conservative degrees of freedom:
- For the amount of entree consumed:
- t-statistic = (x¯Cali - x¯ND) / sqrt((s^2Cali/nCali) + (s^2ND/nND))
- degrees of freedom = min(nCali - 1, nND - 1)
- For the amount of wine consumed:
- t-statistic = (x¯Cali - x¯ND) / sqrt((s^2Cali/nCali) + (s^2ND/nND))
- degrees of freedom = min(nCali - 1, nND - 1)
4) The true statements regarding the conclusion for the entree consumption data are:
- p-value > α (alpha)
- not statistically significant
- Fail to reject H0
5) The true statements regarding the conclusion for the wine consumption data are:
- p-value < α (alpha)
- statistically significant
- Reject H0
6) To estimate the difference in means to within ±0.09mm with 95% confidence, the sample size needed can be calculated using the formula:
- n = (z^2 * σ^2) / E^2
- where z is the z-value for the desired confidence level (for 95% confidence, z ≈ 1.96), σ is the standard deviation, and E is the desired margin of error.
- In this case, n = (1.96^2 * 1.25^2) / 0.09^2 ≈ 49.84
- Therefore, a sample size of at least 50 parts should be sampled to estimate the difference in means within ±0.09mm with 95% confidence.