Question

Doran, a young man of 17, married a young 17-year-old woman. After the wedding they moved to another city, where they both found work and began to buy furniture and appliances. When they realized that they had been unwise in some purchases, they attempted to rescind the contracts, claiming they were minors.

What principle of law is being applied?

What is the decision based upon the principle of law being applied?

Answer 1

The doctrine of minority

Step-by-step explanation:

The principle of law being applied in this case is the doctrine of minority. This doctrine states that minors (people under the age of 18) are not generally bound by contracts they enter into. This is because minors are not considered to be legally competent to make such decisions.

The decision in this case will likely be based on the following factors:

The age of the minors when they entered into the contracts

Whether the minors misrepresented their age to the sellers

Whether the minors understood the terms of the contracts

Whether the minors benefited from the contracts

If the court finds that the minors were indeed minors at the time they entered into the contracts, and that they did not misrepresent their age to the sellers, then it is likely that the court will rescind the contracts. This means that the minors will not be obligated to pay for the furniture and appliances.

However, if the court finds that the minors misrepresented their age to the sellers, or that they understood the terms of the contracts and benefited from them, then the court may uphold the contracts. This means that the minors will be obligated to pay for the furniture and appliances.

It is important to note that the law of contracts varies from state to state. Therefore, it is important to consult with an attorney to get specific advice on the law in your state.