Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Accepting premises that we should doubt makes us guilty of the fallacy known as "Argument from Ignorance" or "Appeal to Ignorance."
This fallacy occurs when someone assumes that a proposition is true (or false) simply because it hasn't been proven otherwise. In other words, it is based on the lack of evidence or knowledge to support a claim.
Here's an example to help illustrate the fallacy:
1. Premise: "There is no evidence that unicorns exist."
2. Conclusion: "Therefore, unicorns do not exist."
In this example, the person assumes that unicorns do not exist solely because there is no evidence to prove their existence. However, absence of evidence is not equivalent to evidence of absence. Just because there is no evidence of unicorns does not mean that they definitively do not exist. This is an example of the fallacy because it relies on doubting the premise (lack of evidence) to draw a conclusion.
So, accepting premises that we should doubt makes us guilty of the fallacy known as the "Argument from Ignorance" or "Appeal to Ignorance." It is important to recognize this fallacy and seek proper evidence and reasoning when evaluating claims.