Answer:
The effectiveness of a passage depends on its purpose, context, and the intended audience. Summarizing what Maurice said can have a similar effect to presenting his statements directly, but it may lack the nuance, tone, and impact of Maurice's original words. Here are some considerations:
Clarity and Brevity: Summarizing Maurice's statements can make the passage more concise and focused, which may be suitable for certain contexts, such as news articles or reports.
Preserving Authenticity: Presenting Maurice's words verbatim can convey his tone, emotions, and specific phrasing, allowing readers to connect with his perspective more intimately.
Emphasis on Direct Quotes: Direct quotes can emphasize the importance or significance of Maurice's statements, especially if they contain powerful or memorable phrases.
Tone and Voice: Maurice's original words may carry his unique tone, voice, and style, which can be lost in a summary.
Engaging the Audience: Depending on the audience and purpose, presenting direct quotes can engage readers more effectively, particularly when the speaker's words are compelling or controversial.
Context Matters: Consider the context and the overall impact you want to achieve. If presenting Maurice's statements directly aligns with your purpose, it may be more effective. However, summarizing might be appropriate if brevity and clarity are paramount.
Ultimately, whether the passage should present Maurice's words directly or summarize them depends on the writer's objectives, the audience, and the desired impact. Both approaches can be effective, but they serve different purposes and can create different reading experiences.
Step-by-step explanation: