Final answer:
The global marketplace typically focuses on monetary trades given their scalability and efficiency, with success stories like Japan and China highlighting the benefits of participating in the global economy. Although nonmonetary trades can be useful in specific contexts, they are unlikely to replace monetary trades due to the sheer volume and complexity of modern international commerce.
Step-by-step explanation:
Should the Global Marketplace Engage in Nonmonetary Trades?
The question of whether the global marketplace should engage in nonmonetary trades touches on complex themes in international commerce. The modern global economy, which is heavily rooted in monetary transactions, could find nonmonetary trades, or bartering, to be less efficient on a large scale. However, barter systems could be beneficial in certain contexts where traditional currency transactions are not feasible or in local economies focused on sustainable practices.
International trade has evolved significantly and integrating into the global economy can facilitate economic growth. This growth has been exemplified by the economic success stories of Japan, East Asian Tiger economies, China, India, and European countries. Participation in global markets through agreements like NAFTA and oversight through organizations like the World Trade Organization (WTO) has been particularly effective in reducing barriers and boosting economies.
While bartering could play a role in localized or specialized sectors, its limited scalability and inefficiency in handling large volumes and values of trade may not contribute effectively to the mainstream $80 trillion global economy. It's important that trade strategies balance the benefits of traditional and innovative practices to optimize economic progress.