Question

Being deaf is not just not listening or listening little; Being deaf goes beyond decibel measurement through an audiogram; Being deaf implies a more linguistic question than just pathological. In this sense, analyze the following assertions about the concept of deafness:

1 is a mistake to call them deaf-mutes
2 deaf-mute is the individual who has a hearing impair
3 mute, hearing impaired and deaf-mute are equivalent terms and can be used, as they are synonymous
many deaf people are not oralized, ie they do not speak, but they emit sounds
5 deaf -Muditic and hearing impaired are equivalent and accepted terms in the deaf community. Fonador apparatus is preserved
The assertions that correctly contemplate the concept of deafness and deaf identity are respectively:

Answer 1

The assertions that correctly contemplate the concept of deafness and deaf identity are:
1. It is a mistake to call them deaf-mutes.
2. Mute, hearing impaired, and deaf-mute are equivalent terms and can be used, as they are synonymous.
5. Deaf-mute and hearing impaired are equivalent and accepted terms in the deaf community. The vocal apparatus is preserved.

These assertions acknowledge that being deaf involves more than just a hearing impairment and that terms like "deaf-mute" can be misleading and inaccurate. It recognizes that many deaf individuals do not speak but may still make sounds, and that the terms "deaf-mute" and "hearing impaired" are accepted within the deaf community.