Final answer:
The Atlantic slave trade was vastly different because of its scale, the conduction conditions, and its application mainly for plantation work in the Americas. Its chattel nature where enslaved people were property that could be bought, sold and inherited, was unlike Africa's customary practices where slavery often intertwined with warfare or debts. Despite similarities, their treatment of enslaved people and the permanence of the condition marked the difference.
Step-by-step explanation:
Distinctive about the Atlantic slave trade was its massive scale, the inhuman conditions the enslaved people were subjected to, and its labor-intensive characteristics, primarily for plantation work in the Americas. Unlike traditional forms of slavery in Africa, where enslaved people often had certain rights and their status was not hereditary, the Atlantic slavery turned people into chattel, property that could be bought, sold, and inherited, with status being passed on to their children.
The Atlantic slave trade shared with other patterns of slave owning and trading the reality of enslaved people being captured or bought as a result of conflicts or wars. In both the Atlantic slave trade and the internal African trade, enslavement was typically a byproduct of warfare or indebtedness. The main distinction, however, is seen in how societies treated enslaved people and the permanence of their condition.
The impact of this forced migration under grueling conditions was significant, causing devastating population losses in Africa, fracturing societies, and leaving deep psychological scars that are still felt today.
Learn more about Atlantic slave trade