Answer:O is based on testing and evidence.
Step-by-step explanation:
Scientific reasoning can help solve the argument between two towns over how to treat wastewater that goes into a river because it is based on testing and evidence.
Scientific reasoning involves using the scientific method, which includes systematic observation, experimentation, and data analysis. Through these processes, researchers can gather objective evidence and test different hypotheses regarding wastewater treatment. For example, they can measure the levels of pollutants in the water before and after different treatment methods to determine their effectiveness.
By relying on testing and evidence, scientific reasoning allows for a more objective evaluation of the different treatment options. This helps to minimize biases and subjectivity that may arise from personal opinions or beliefs. Instead, decisions about wastewater treatment can be based on concrete data and measurable outcomes.
Additionally, scientific reasoning involves judgments that identify good and bad ideas. Scientists can critically evaluate the potential benefits and drawbacks of various treatment approaches. They can consider factors such as environmental impact, cost-effectiveness, and long-term sustainability. This allows for a more comprehensive assessment of the different options and helps in making informed decisions.
In summary, scientific reasoning can help solve the argument over wastewater treatment because it is based on testing and evidence, providing objective and reliable information. It also involves judgments that identify good and bad ideas, allowing for a thorough evaluation of the different treatment options.