128k views
4 votes
Context?

"Body Ritual among the Nacirema"
According to anthropologist Horace Miner's 1956 article, the Nacirema build shrines
devoted to their bodily condition in their homes and seek the services of a cruel and
sadistic "holy-mouth-man" on a regular basis. When physically ill, they visit imposing
temples, called latipsos, that strike fear in the hearts of children, who believe them to
be the places where you go to die." Only a careful reading of this article helps the
reader discern that Miner is talking about his own people; the word Nacirema is
actually American spelled backward.
Reread the passage from "Body Ritual among the Nacirema" linked on this page, anc
then consider this claim:
Historical context is the most important factor to consider when
analyzing a source of historical evidence.
To what extent do you agree with this claim? You will use evidence from "Body Rituan
among the Nacirema" to support your opinion.

User Rob Howard
by
8.1k points

1 Answer

0 votes

Step-by-step explanation:

Historical context is crucial for accurately understanding and interpreting sources of historical evidence. In the case of "Body Ritual among the Nacirema," recognizing the historical context of the 1950s helps us grasp the article's satirical critique of American society. Understanding that the Nacirema are actually Americans reversed allows us to appreciate the deeper message and insights about cultural biases. Without considering historical context, one may misinterpret the article as describing a foreign culture rather than reflecting on our own society. In this specific example, historical context plays a significant role in comprehending the intent and significance of the article.

User Bluesixty
by
7.9k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.