Question

Select all the correct answers.

Kiran is participating in a debate about the value of geolocation technology. She argues that geolocation technology hasn't really had any large-scale
benefits for society. She says that it has made the world more commercial by feelding our data to corporations and has stripped us of our privacy. She
feels that since geolocation has its roots in military technology, it can never be used for positive goals. Based on the information provided in the lesson,
Which two arguments can be used against Kiran's position?
Geolocation technology can be used to create economic and infrastructure development plans.
Geolocation technology can be used to monitor elections.
Geolocation technology can be used to monitor diversity in a region.
Geolocation technology can be used to identify promising local leaders.
Geolocation technology can be used to create forecasts and warning systems for natural disasters.

Answer 1

The two arguments that can be used against Kiran's position that geolocation technology can never be used for positive goals are:

Geolocation technology can be used to create economic and infrastructure development plans.

This argument suggests that geolocation technology can be harnessed for the betterment of communities and regions by aiding in the planning and development of infrastructure and economies, which are positive goals.

Geolocation technology can be used to create forecasts and warning systems for natural disasters.

This argument highlights the potential life-saving applications of geolocation technology in providing early warnings and forecasts for natural disasters. Protecting people from harm is undoubtedly a positive goal.

These two arguments demonstrate that geolocation technology has a wide range of positive applications beyond its military roots.

Step-by-step explanation: