189k views
5 votes
Why was the regulator movement ineffective?

The regulators were not trained
The regulators abused the system
The regulators would not punish their friends
The regulators had no place to detain suspected lawbreakers

2 Answers

3 votes

Answer:

The word “incapacitation” means 'to prevent the offence by punishing, so that the future generation fears to commit the criminal act. ' Incapacitation happens either by removing the person from the society, either temporarily, or permanently, or by some other method, which restricts him due to physical inability.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Jesse Hill
by
8.0k points
0 votes

Answer:

The statement "The regulators had no place to detain suspected lawbreakers" is a plausible reason why the regulator movement may have been ineffective.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the context of historical movements, such as the Regulation movement in colonial America or similar movements elsewhere, an effective law enforcement or regulatory system typically requires infrastructure and resources for apprehending, detaining, and processing suspected lawbreakers. If the regulators lacked proper facilities or means to detain those they considered lawbreakers, it could hinder their ability to enforce regulations and maintain order effectively. This could lead to challenges in achieving their goals and enforcing their ideals, making the movement less effective.

User Visruth
by
7.8k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.