Historians might change their interpretation of an event if new evidence is discovered, as this can provide a different perspective or data that may influence how they understand the event. It's about truth and accuracy rather than popularity or speed of publication.
A reason why historians might change their interpretation of an event is if a new piece of evidence is discovered. This new evidence can shed a fresh or different light on the event, influencing how historians understand and interpret it. For example, new archaeological findings can provide new data that may contradict or affirm existing historical interpretations. It's not about popularity, likeability, or the speed of publication as mentioned in other options, but about the truth and accuracy of the historical narrative.
Learn more about historical interpretation