57.0k views
4 votes
True/False In Hyde v Wrench (1840), the court held that a counter offer destroyed the original offer, making it no longer open for acceptance.

1 Answer

7 votes

True. In Hyde v Wrench (1840), the court held that a counteroffer made by one party to the other party destroyed the original offer, rendering it no longer open for acceptance. This principle is based on the idea that a counteroffer constitutes a rejection of the original offer, terminating its validity.

꒰⑅ᵕ༚ᵕ꒱˖♡

User Mohammad
by
8.4k points

No related questions found