Final answer:
In critiquing Van Gogh's 'Starry Night', one should focus on both the technical aspects and the emotional resonance of the piece to provide a thorough evaluation. Statements regarding the artist's use of curved lines to imply movement and the work's wistful, hopeful mood address key elements of a substantive critique.
Step-by-step explanation:
When critiquing a piece of art, particularly Vincent van Gogh's Starry Night, it's essential to provide an evaluation that addresses the artwork's aesthetic and technical components, as well as the emotional resonance it creates. In the evaluation section of your critique, it would be fitting to mention how the artist uses curved lines to create movement in the sky, a technique that contributes to the dynamic quality of the night sky in the painting. Additionally, you could comment on the mood of the piece, which seems wistful and hopeful, as this speaks to the emotional impact the painting has on viewers, as well as the thematic concerns of the artist.
However, if the goal is to focus on a critique that delves deep into the merits and approach of the painting itself and its impact on the observer or the art world, options (c) 'The artist uses curved lines to create movement in the sky.' and (d) 'The mood seems wistful and hopeful.' are more suitable, as these statements evaluate the painting's form, technique, and emotional impact.