Question

Read the claim, related reason, and evidence a student wrote about "The Most Dangerous Game.” Claim: Rainsford should not kill Zaroff. Reason: Rainsford believes that men should not hunt other men. Evidence: "Surely your experiences in the war—" "Did not make me condone cold-blooded murder," finished Rainsford stiffly. Which explanation best states how the evidence supports the student’s reason? Killing a man compromises Rainsford’s beliefs. Killing Zaroff will not end the hunting game. Killing prey will prove Rainsford’s skills. Killing a general is a declaration of war.

Answer 1

A. Killing a man compromises Rainsford’s beliefs.

Step-by-step explanation:

Took the test on ed

Answer 2

A. Killing a man compromises Rainsford’s beliefs.

Step-by-step explanation:

The claim is that Rainsford should not have killed Zaroff and that it is not justified. The best answer to support that is that killing a man compromises Rainsford's beliefs.

I hope that this helps! :)