Answer:
The differences between how Brutus and the Romans viewed human nature and how Alexander Hamilton and the Federalists viewed human nature revolved around their fundamental perspectives on human behavior and government. Brutus and the Anti-Federalists, including Thomas Jefferson, had a more pessimistic view of human nature, believing that people were inherently prone to corruption and that concentrated power would inevitably lead to tyranny. They were wary of a strong centralized government and favored greater power for state governments to protect individual liberties.
On the other hand, Alexander Hamilton and the Federalists had a more optimistic view of human nature. They believed that a strong central government was necessary to provide stability, security, and promote economic development. Hamilton, in particular, had confidence that a system of checks and balances, along with the Constitution's safeguards, could prevent the abuse of power.
Hamilton disagreed with the spirit of Brutus and the Anti-Federalists in their concerns about excessive government power at the state level and their skepticism about a strong federal government. He argued that a unified nation with a strong federal government would better serve the interests of the United States. His views influenced the design of the Constitution by advocating for a stronger federal government with enumerated powers, a stronger executive branch, and federal control over economic policies, such as the establishment of a national bank.
Whether Hamilton was correct in his views is a matter of ongoing debate among historians and political scholars. Some argue that his vision of a strong federal government has contributed to the stability and success of the United States, while others contend that it has at times led to overreach and centralization of power. Ultimately, the compromises reached during the Constitutional Convention and the adoption of the Constitution reflect the balance between these differing views of human nature and government's role in society.
Step-by-step explanation: