164k views
3 votes
The US Constitution prevents any individual form from holding absolute power over the government is also requires leaders to be elected by citizens rather than allowing leaders to pass power down to their children which of these enlightenment philosophers would have most disagreed with this system of government

User Ken Chen
by
7.9k points

2 Answers

3 votes
The answer is Thomas Hobbes! “Hobbes believed in a strong central authority and the idea of absolute power.”
User HeadhunterKev
by
7.4k points
5 votes

Answer:

The Enlightenment philosophers believed in different ideas and had varying views on government. One philosopher who would have disagreed with the system described in the question is Thomas Hobbes.

Hobbes believed in the concept of an absolute monarchy, where a single ruler holds all the power and authority. He argued that humans are naturally selfish and driven by their own self-interests, and therefore, a strong central authority is necessary to maintain order and prevent chaos.

In contrast, the system described in the question is based on the principles of democracy and limited government. The US Constitution establishes a system of checks and balances, where power is divided among different branches of government to prevent any individual or group from gaining absolute power.

Furthermore, the Constitution also includes mechanisms such as elections to ensure that leaders are chosen by the citizens rather than inheriting power. This idea of popular sovereignty is in line with the Enlightenment philosopher John Locke's belief in the consent of the governed.

Therefore, while some Enlightenment philosophers may have disagreed with certain aspects of the US system of government, Thomas Hobbes would have been the one who most disagreed due to his advocacy for absolute monarchy.

Step-by-step explanation:

User TechnoIndifferent
by
8.5k points

No related questions found