Final answer:
Renewable resources can be replenished over time while non-renewable resources are finite and cannot be easily replaced. Renewable resources are considered more sustainable because they do not deplete. Non-renewable resources take millions of years to form and cannot be easily replenished.
Step-by-step explanation:
Renewable resources are natural resources that can be replenished or regenerated over time, such as solar energy, wind energy, and water resources. They are considered more sustainable because they do not deplete or take millions of years to replenish. On the other hand, non-renewable resources are finite and exist in limited quantities, like fossil fuels and minerals, which take millions of years to form and cannot be easily replaced, once depleted. Non-renewable resources are not sustainable in the long run as their usage leads to environmental degradation and they will eventually run out.
Learn more about Difference between renewable and non-renewable resources