Register

How did the Supreme Court rule in the Dred Scott case? A The Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional. B Popular sovereignty was the only legal way to settle the slavery debate.…

How did the Supreme Court rule in the Dred Scott case? A The Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional. B Popular sovereignty was the only legal way to settle the slavery debate.…
168k views
5 votes
How did the Supreme Court rule in the Dred Scott case? A The Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional. B Popular sovereignty was the only legal way to settle the slavery debate. C The Fugitive Slave Act was unconstitutional. D The Constitution protected slave holding as a property right.

User Arnaud Leymet
by
7.9k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Answer:

the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional

Step-by-step explanation:

A.

User Silvans Solanki
by
8.6k points
← Prev Question Next Question →

Related questions

Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories

Other Questions

Jacinda makes collections on real estate loans. Last year, she made approximately 20 collections and collected $38,000. Must Jacinda be licensed?
Outline the process by which most federal judges are nominated and approved
When an excessive amount of alcohol is consumed causing a person to stop or breath slowly, vomit in their sleep. or appear pale or bluish the person is possibly suffering from • Binge drinking Intoxication
Link Copied!