Register

How did the Supreme Court rule in the Dred Scott case? A The Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional. B Popular sovereignty was the only legal way to settle the slavery debate.…

How did the Supreme Court rule in the Dred Scott case? A The Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional. B Popular sovereignty was the only legal way to settle the slavery debate.…
168k views
5 votes
How did the Supreme Court rule in the Dred Scott case? A The Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional. B Popular sovereignty was the only legal way to settle the slavery debate. C The Fugitive Slave Act was unconstitutional. D The Constitution protected slave holding as a property right.

User Arnaud Leymet
by
7.9k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Answer:

the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional

Step-by-step explanation:

A.

User Silvans Solanki
by
8.6k points
← Prev Question Next Question →

Related questions

Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories

Other Questions

Outline the process by which most federal judges are nominated and approved
The only person to serve two non-consecutive terms as u.S. President was known by what nickname?
When mixed with alcohol, a medication can become all of the following, except __________ . A. healthier B. useless C. unpredictable
Link Copied!