Question

Imagine that a law has been proposed that would require large companies to increase protections of consumers' personal data. if castillo were reacting to this proposed law, which claim would he most likely make? a. this law is necessary to preserve consumer privacy against careless handling of data by large companies. b. this law is unnecessary because consumers should be more careful about the data that they provide to companies. c. this law is necessary to decrease the demand on law enforcement agencies to catch criminals who steal consumer data. d this law is unnecessary because large companies should help law enforcement agencies capture criminals who steal consumer p data.

Answer 1

Castillo would most likely claim that the proposed A. law to increase consumer data protection by large companies is necessary to preserve consumer privacy and trust.

Step-by-step explanation:

If Castillo were reacting to the proposed law that would require large companies to increase protections of consumers' data, he might claim that this law is necessary to preserve consumer privacy against careless handling of data by large companies. Given the increasing concerns about cyber data issues with privacy, and considering that state and federal laws in the United States already protect personal cyber data, a law that amplifies these protections would likely be regarded as essential.

Furthermore, considering the public's concern over how companies and governments collect and use personal information, with 79 percent concerned about data use by companies and 64 percent by the government, Castillo might advocate for stronger regulations as a means to rebuild trust and ensure the privacy of consumers.

Answer 2

Castillo would likely advocate for a law that is necessary to preserve consumer privacy, reflecting concerns over the careful handling of data by large companies.

Step-by-step explanation:

Considering that this question is related to the protection of consumers' personal data by large companies, it appears that Castillo's viewpoint would align with the necessity for legal measures to uphold consumer privacy and ensure companies handle data responsibly. Therefore, the claim Castillo would most likely make is: this law is necessary to preserve consumer privacy against careless handling of data by large companies.

The need for such a law derives from the fact that individuals contend their right to digital data privacy is in line with their right to privacy of 'houses, papers, and effects' under the Fourth Amendment. Additionally, data privacy concerns highlight the growing tension between the security measures for community welfare and the protection of individual privacy and freedom of expression of ideas. The significance of consumer concerns is further exemplified by surveys showing that a substantial percentage of the population is worried about personal data use by companies and government alike.