Out of the four options, 'extra gills for oxygen extraction' would be the most beneficial adaptation for a fish living in a slow-flowing stream. This adaptation would help the fish cope with lower oxygen levels often found in stagnant or slow-flowing bodies of water.
The question is asking for the most plausible adaptation a fish inhabiting slow-flowing streams could develop. In this context, Option 2: 'Extra gills, for oxygen extraction' is the best answer. Slow-flowing streams may have less dissolved oxygen compared to fast-flowing ones due to the lack of turbulence that typically helps oxygenate the water. Consequently, fish in these environments might adapt with additional or more efficient gills to cope with the limited oxygen levels. Such efficient oxygen extraction could give them a survival advantage in this specific ecosystem. The other options don't seem to be adaptations specifically beneficial for life in slow-flowing streams. For example, attracting prey by glowing (option 1) tends to be prevalent in deep-sea creatures while extra fat for warmth (option 4) is typically found in cold-water species.
Learn more about Fish Adaptation