Question

U.s. free trade agreements, 2017 map indicates countries that had free trade agreements with the united states in 2017. these countries include, by continent: canada and mexico (north america); guatemala, el salvador, honduras, nicaragua, costa rica, panama, dominican republic (central america); colombia, peru, chile (south america); morocco (africa); bahrain, israel, jordan, oman, palestine, singapore, south korea (asia); australia. cc-by-4.0 opponents of free trade zones might use this map to argue which of the following points? a. free trade encourages cooperation between market and command economies free trade leads to greater mobility among populations. b. free trade can encourage interaction with both near and distant economies. c. free trade redraws traditional geographic boundaries.

Answer 1

Opponents of free trade zones may argue that increased imports can lead to domestic job losses and that larger economies and multinationals benefit most from free trade agreements like NAFTA, potentially at the expense of smaller economies.

Step-by-step explanation:

Opponents of free trade zones, when analyzing the U.S. free trade agreements map of 2017, might argue that free trade can lead to job losses domestically due to increased imports. While free trade agreements like the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) facilitate trade by reducing barriers such as tariffs and import laws, they can also result in more goods being produced overseas as opposed to domestically. This shift can harm local industries and lead to a decline in job opportunities within the importing country. Additionally, opponents may argue that free trade agreements benefit multinationals and advanced economies at the expense of smaller economies and can potentially redraw traditional geographic boundaries due to companies relocating to take advantage of lower production costs.

Answer 2

A. Free trade breaks down barriers among nations.

Step-by-step explanation: