Answer:
Consider these two statements and the resulting conclusion statement for each, tell how both statement results are Misleading. 1) Most car... accidents occur within a 5 mile perimeter of your home. Therefore, it is more dangerous to drive within a 5 mile perimeter of your home. 2) Most companies CEO (Chief Executive Officer) are 1st born children. Therefore, more 1st born children are more likely to be CEO's than the 2nd born, 3rd born, etc
Explanation:
1) Most car accidents occur within a 5-mile perimeter of your home. Therefore, it is more dangerous to drive within a 5-mile perimeter of your home.
Misleading aspect: This statement assumes that the proximity to one's home is the cause of increased danger while driving. However, it fails to consider other factors such as the frequency of driving within the 5-mile perimeter, the familiarity of the area, or the behavior of the driver. There might be higher accident rates near home simply because people tend to spend more time driving in familiar areas.
2) Most company CEOs are first-born children. Therefore, first-born children are more likely to be CEOs than second-born, third-born, etc.
Misleading aspect: This statement assumes a direct causal relationship between birth order and becoming a CEO. However, it neglects other significant factors, such as education, experience, skills, and personal ambition. The correlation between birth order and becoming a CEO could be coincidental or influenced by various socioeconomic factors.
In both cases, correlation does not necessarily imply causation. To draw accurate conclusions, it is essential to consider additional variables and conduct more comprehensive research to establish causal relationships. Simply observing a correlation does not provide enough evidence to make definitive claims.