195k views
5 votes
Kasey and emma are examining the triangles formed by a diagonal of a rectangle. kasey believes a diagonal will always partition a rectangle into two right triangles. her reasoning is that since every rectangle has four right angles, each triangle formed by the diagonals will have a right angle. emma believes a diagonal will always partition a rectangle into two congruent triangles. her reasoning is that since the diagonal acts as a transversal between parallel lines, the asa criterion is satisfied by the diagonal and the two angles formed by the transversal. whose reasoning is valid? a. both kasey and emma's reasoning is valid. b. only emma's reasoning is valid. c. neither kasey nor emma's reasoning is valid. d. only kasey's reasoning is valid.

2 Answers

5 votes

Final answer:

Both Kasey's reasoning about right angles in the triangles and Emma's reasoning about the triangles being congruent because of the ASA criterion are valid. Therefore, a diagonal does indeed partition a rectangle into two congruent right triangles.

Step-by-step explanation:

Kasey and Emma are both correct in their reasoning about the triangles formed by a diagonal of a rectangle. Kasey believes that each triangle will have a right angle because a rectangle has four right angles, and this is true. When a diagonal of a rectangle is drawn, it cuts the rectangle into two right triangles. The right angle of the rectangle becomes the right angle for both triangles.

Emma states that a diagonal will always partition a rectangle into two congruent triangles. Her reasoning about the diagonal acting as a transversal between parallel lines and satisfying the ASA criterion is also valid. The congruent angles at each end of the diagonal and the equal lengths of the diagonal itself ensure by Angle-Side-Angle congruence that the triangles are congruent.

The answer to the student's question is A. Both Kasey and Emma's reasoning is valid.

User Vffuunnyy
by
8.0k points
2 votes

Final answer:

As per the case a. Both Kasey and Emma's reasoning are valid. A diagonal of a rectangle will always partition the rectangle into two right triangles, and it will partition the rectangle into two congruent triangles as well.

Step-by-step explanation:

The diagonal of a rectangle is a line segment connecting opposite corners or vertices. It forms the hypotenuse of two congruent right triangles within the rectangle. The length of the diagonal can be calculated using the Pythagorean theorem.

Both Kasey and Emma's reasoning are valid. A diagonal of a rectangle will always partition the rectangle into two right triangles, which supports Kasey's reasoning. Additionally, a diagonal of a rectangle will always act as a transversal between parallel lines and satisfy the ASA criterion for congruent triangles, supporting Emma's reasoning. In both cases, the properties of rectangles and triangles are used to support their conclusions.

User Eric Winterstine
by
7.7k points