Answer:
Ultimately, the differences between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists were resolved through a compromise. The Federalists agreed to include the Bill of Rights in the Constitution, while the Anti-Federalists agreed to support the ratification of the document. This compromise allowed for the formation of a strong central government while also protecting individual liberties and state rights.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Federalists and Anti-Federalists were two political groups that emerged during the late 18th century in the United States. The Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton, believed in a strong central government with a national bank and a powerful military. In contrast, the Anti-Federalists, led by Thomas Jefferson, advocated for states' rights and limited government intervention in people's lives.
At the center of the debate between the two groups was the ratification of the United States Constitution. The Federalists argued that a strong central government was necessary to maintain order and stability in the newly formed nation. They believed that a national bank and a powerful military would help to protect American interests and ensure the country's prosperity.
In contrast, the Anti-Federalists were concerned about the potential dangers of a strong central government. They feared that such a government would infringe on their individual liberties and violate the principles of democracy. They also believed that the Constitution did not do enough to protect the rights of the states and the people.
To address these concerns, the Federalists proposed a series of amendments to the Constitution, known as the Bill of Rights. These amendments, which included the First Amendment's protection of free speech and religion, the Second Amendment's right to bear arms, and the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, were designed to limit the power of the federal government and protect individual liberties.
(I hope this helps you)