Question

A criminal background check revealed that a candidate had been arrested for

creating a public disturbance. Why should the hiring company not use this
information?
O A. Because the arrest may not have led to a conviction.
B. Because creating a public disturbance is not a serious crime.
O C. Because criminal background checks are not legal.
D. Because the candidate is highly qualified for the job.

Answer 1

The answer is A, I say this because, just because someone has been arrested it doesn't mean that it can lead to a conviction and that's knowledge. NOT B because everything is taken as a serious crime in the laws eyes. NOT C cause they are legal, NOT D cause you can't just discard someone's back group because of their qualifications!

Answer 2

Step-by-step explanation:

it’s B