111k views
5 votes
Comparing the benefits of different low-impact development (lid) practices, which of these would be best suited for recharging groundwater? a. riparian buffers b. green roofs c. bioretention areas d. filter strips e. porous concrete

User Homtg
by
7.6k points

2 Answers

4 votes

Final answer:

Bioretention areas would be the best suited for recharging groundwater as they capture and treat stormwater runoff, allowing it to infiltrate into the ground and recharge the groundwater.

Step-by-step explanation:

Of the different low-impact development (LID) practices listed, bioretention areas would be the best suited for recharging groundwater. Bioretention areas are designed to capture and treat stormwater runoff, allowing it to infiltrate into the ground and recharge the groundwater. They typically consist of vegetated areas with engineered soil and permeable media that facilitate water infiltration.

User ASX
by
7.8k points
5 votes

Final answer:

Bioretention areas are the best low-impact development (LID) practice for recharging groundwater, as they capture and treat stormwater runoff, allowing it to infiltrate into the ground. They consist of shallow basins filled with soil, sand, and plants that enhance infiltration.

Step-by-step explanation:

For recharging groundwater, the best low-impact development (LID) practice would be bioretention areas. Bioretention areas are designed to capture and treat stormwater runoff, allowing it to infiltrate into the ground and recharge the groundwater. These areas typically consist of shallow, depressed basins filled with a mixture of soil, sand, and plants that help filter the water and enhance infiltration.

Riparian buffers are vegetated areas near water bodies that help protect water quality but may not be directly involved in recharging groundwater. Green roofs, porous concrete, and filter strips can also help manage stormwater but may not be as effective as bioretention areas in recharging groundwater.

User Alexey Smirnov
by
8.3k points