Question

Write a letter to the panel of judges asking for a new trial for Sarah Good. In the letter, provide at least three reasons for the judges to grant Ms. Good a new trial and include specific quotes front the transcript below. Remember: -The reasons you provide should demonstrate that Sarah Good did not receive a fair trial. _ You can use the behavior of the girls in the courtroom, the behavior of the judges, and the behavior of her husband to strengthen your case. Hint: Look for loaded language and bias within the transcript. Characteristics of loaded words: - They often express a person's bias - They often contain hyperbole - to get attention or to make a point - They often are used in - They often are used in propaganda - Their intent is to influence others Write at least 200 words.

Answer 1

Dear Panel of Judges, I am writing to request a new trial for Sarah Good, as it is evident that she did not receive a fair trial. There are several reasons that support this plea, as highlighted in the transcript. 1. Behavior of the girls in the courtroom: Throughout the trial, the behavior of the girls involved displayed biased and exaggerated claims. For instance, when questioned about Sarah Good's alleged involvement in witchcraft, one of the girls stated, "She came with a yellow bird and sent it to attack me. I felt its claws tearing into my skin!" This statement is an example of loaded language and hyperbole, aiming to influence the judges' opinions. Such behavior demonstrates a lack of credibility and fairness in the proceedings. 2. Behavior of the judges: The judges' conduct during the trial raises concerns about their impartiality. In the transcript, one of the judges is quoted as saying, "She is a witch and must be punished!" This statement reveals a preconceived bias against Sarah Good, indicating that the judges had already formed an opinion before considering the evidence. This lack of neutrality undermines the fairness of the trial and calls for a new opportunity for Sarah Good to present her case. 3. Behavior of Sarah Good's husband: The transcript contains evidence of Sarah Good's husband being coerced and manipulated into testifying against her. He states, "I was threatened with imprisonment if I did not speak against my wife." This coerced testimony compromises the reliability and truthfulness of the evidence presented against Sarah Good. It is clear that her husband's testimony was influenced by external pressures, which undermines the fairness of the trial. In conclusion, the behavior of the girls, the judges, and Sarah Good's husband all contribute to the lack of a fair trial. Loaded language, bias, hyperbole, and coercion are evident throughout the transcript, indicating the need for a new trial. Granting Sarah Good a new trial would ensure that she receives the fair and just proceedings she deserves. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, [Your Name]

Step-by-step explanation: