Question

According to the federalists, why was a separate bill of rights unnecessary? The constitution creates a weak central government with defined and limited powers. The principles of separation of powers and checks and balances protect individual liberty. The constitution ensures that elected representatives reflect the diversity of the people. The state governments hold final authority and therefore could prevent abuse of power.

Answer 1

The principles of separation of powers and checks and balances protect individual liberty.

Step-by-step explanation:

I got it right on the test.

Answer 2

The Federalists believed that a separate Bill of Rights was unnecessary because the Constitution already provided protection for individual liberties through a strong central government, separation of powers and checks and balances, elected representatives reflecting diversity, and the authority of state governments.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Federalists believed that a separate Bill of Rights was unnecessary because they believed that the Constitution already provided adequate protection for individual liberties. They argued that the Constitution created a strong central government with defined and limited powers, and that the principles of separation of powers and checks and balances within the Constitution ensured the protection of individual liberties.

Furthermore, the Federalists believed that the Constitution ensured that elected representatives reflected the diversity of the people, therefore safeguarding individual rights and interests. Additionally, they argued that the authority of state governments served as a final check on the central government and could prevent any potential abuse of power.

Learn more about Separate Bill of Rights