Circular reasoning is a logical and therefore not valid. The correct answer is b. False. It is a fallacy as it doesn't provide any new information, but just restates the original assertion.
Circular reasoning is not considered to be valid. The option would be b. False. Circular reasoning is a type of logical fallacy where the conclusion of an argument is used as a premise of that same argument. This means that the argument does not provide any new information, just restates the initial assertion. For example, if someone states 'The Bible is true because God wrote it, and we know God wrote it because the Bible says so.' This is circular reasoning as it bases its validity on its own assertion.
Learn more about Circular reasoning