Answer:
Aristotle, the ancient Greek philosopher, had a comprehensive set of beliefs about motion that were influential in the development of natural philosophy and science in his time. His views on motion were quite different from the later, more mathematically based theories put forth by scientists like Galileo and Newton. Here are some key aspects of Aristotle's beliefs about motion:
Step-by-step explanation:
Natural Motion and Violent Motion: Aristotle distinguished between two types of motion: natural motion and violent motion. Natural motion was the concept that objects had a "natural" place in the universe, and they would move toward that place if not obstructed. For example, earth and water naturally moved downward, while air and fire moved upward. Violent motion, on the other hand, was any motion that was caused by an external force.
Teleological View: Aristotle believed that everything in the natural world had a purpose or telos. He applied this idea to motion by suggesting that objects moved in a way that fulfilled their purpose. For example, a rock fell to the ground because its natural place was at the center of the Earth.
Circular Motion: Aristotle argued that celestial bodies, such as the planets and stars, moved in perfect, uniform circular motion. He believed this motion was more divine and perfect than the irregular, terrestrial motion of objects on Earth.