Question

In United States v. Lopez (1995), the U.S. Supreme Court:

a. affirmed the constitutionality of the Gun-Free School Zones Act. b. struck down the Gun-Free School Zones Act as being unrelated to interstate commerce and, therefore, unconstitutional. c. upheld a municipal ordinance banning all handguns, shotguns with barrels less than 18 inches and guns firing more than eight shots in repetition.
d. struck down a municipal ordinance banning all handguns, shotguns with barrels less than 18 inches and guns firing more than eight shots in repetition.

Answer 1

In United States v. Lopez (1995), the Supreme Court ruled the Gun-Free School Zones Act as being unrelated to interstate commerce and, therefore, unconstitutional. The case centered on a high school student who brought a gun to school and was charged under the federal law.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the case of United States v. Lopez (1995), the U.S. Supreme Court made a landmark ruling that greatly affected the interpretation of the Commerce Clause in the U.S Constitution. The correct answer to your question is: b. struck down the Gun-Free School Zones Act as being unrelated to interstate commerce and, therefore, unconstitutional. This decision marked a significant moment as it was one of the few instances that the court claimed legislative overreach relating to commerce by Congress.

This case centered around Alfonso Lopez, a high-school student who brought a firearm to school. He was charged under the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990, a federal law. However, the defense argued that the law exceeded Congress's power to regulate commerce among states, and the Supreme Court agreed, thus declaring the law unconstitutional.

Learn more about United States v. Lopez