Final answer:
A scientific argument dealing with nature must take all known evidence into account to ensure accuracy and comprehensiveness. Ignoring some evidence can lead to inaccuracies or misconceptions. Science seeks to reveal the objective truth about the natural world, which is why it's important to incorporate all relevant evidence.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the realm of science, a scientific argument that deals with any aspect of nature must consider all known evidence to generate comprehensive and accurate conclusions. This is crucial because leaving out any relevant evidence can lead to inaccurate findings or misunderstandings.
In science, arguments are built upon evidence collected through observation and experimentation. A comprehensive view of all the evidence allows scientists to make the most accurate interpretations and predictions. Let's say a scientist is studying a certain type of plant species. If they only analyze part of the data or evidence, they might overlook crucial characteristics of the species, such as its response to certain environmental conditions.
In essence, science seeks to reveal the objective truth about the natural world, which is why every piece of relevant evidence is important. By incorporating all of the known evidence, a scientific argument becomes more robust, more compelling, and more likely to be accurate.
Learn more about Scientific Argument