Final answer:
Getting infected a)in a hospital, b)a livestock barn, or c)a city might increase the risk of contracting antibiotic-resistant bacteria due to high antibiotic usage in these areas. The safest option might be a remote, sparsely populated area; however, a serious bacterial illness can have a similar negative impact regardless of where contracted.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question pertains to where one would rather get infected with a serious bacterial disease, considering the prevalence and resistance of bacteria to antibiotics in different environments. Contrary to what one might think, getting infected in a hospital, a livestock barn, or a city where antibiotics are routinely prescribed might actually be more dangerous due to the risk of contracting antibiotic-resistant bacteria. These bacteria have evolved to survive in environments with high antibiotic usage.
Ideally, you wouldn't want to get infected anywhere, but if choosing, option D (a remote, sparsely populated area where the bacteria have not been exposed to antibiotic drugs) might be the 'safest' since the bacteria there would be less likely to be antibiotic-resistant. However, option E is also correct in a sense because a serious bacterial illness can have a similar impact on your health regardless of where you pick it up, especially if it's caused by a bacteria that is, or becomes, resistant to antibiotics.
Learn more about antibiotic-resistant bacteria